logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.01.17 2016가합24103
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) the full amount of KRW 36,218,610 and its payment from October 28, 2017.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates the “D Hospital” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the Plaintiff is a person hospitalized until now after undergoing an examination at the Defendant Hospital’s local landscape on October 2, 2014.

B. (1) From August 2014, the Plaintiff was receiving treatment from a nearby hospital due to a sense of satisfy and organ infection, and the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant hospital on September 25, 2014, when the symptoms of satisfy have not been mitigated even after two months. (2) On the same day, the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital conducted a chest X-ray, chest CT shooting, and pulmonary function test for the Plaintiff on the same day.

As a result of chest X-ray shooting, the pulmonary leap was observed on the left side of the plaintiff, and as a result of the examination of the pulmonary function, the FVC (Efforts active quantity) was confirmed to be 75% of the normal value, and the light restrictive pulmonary disorder was observed.

3) On October 2, 2014, the Plaintiff re-exploited to the Defendant Hospital and confirmed the result of chest CT shooting, and was a suspected opinion that there was a liveric disease. Accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital was the Plaintiff to undergo an additional examination and diagnosis (hereinafter “instant inspection”).

(4) Around 11:50 on the same day, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Defendant Hospital in order to undergo the instant inspection, and the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the instant inspection from around 16:25 to the Plaintiff.

C. The medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital recovered the Plaintiff’s tissue through the instant test, and removed her son, and subsequently observed her son’s son. Accordingly, the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel implemented her dialogic medication and ephine injection, and her ephine injection using double ephesion tubes, etc. on October 2, 2014. (2) On October 17:30, 2014, around blood pressure 90/60mHg, her 110/minute, and her fluoric acid 81%.

arrow