beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act (2012 order 2293, 2012 order 2598) (the Defendant entered into a check contract with the head of the National Bank and the Defendant from November 27, 1999, and traded household checks.
around February 29, 2012, the Defendant issued 11 copies of the family check worth KRW 33,00,000 in total face value as stated in the attached Table 1 from around that time to March 5, 2012, including the issuance of one copy of the above bank bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which is the “E number”, “3,00,000,000”, and the issuance date of the above bank bank check in the name of the Defendant at the D office operated by the Defendant in the commercial building located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant issued 11 copies of the bank check worth KRW 33,00,000 in total at face value as stated in the list of crimes in attached Table 1 (However, the original check was recovered from the list of sights, and the indictment was revoked). Each of the above holders presented the above bank within the period of payment presentment, but the Defendant did not receive the above check on the date of deposit or suspension of transactions.
On April 2012, 2012, the Defendant issued six copies of the household check amounting to KRW 18 million in total face value and presented the said check to the said bank within the time limit for payment of the said check to the extent that the victims did not receive suspension of transaction, including the issuance of one copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as F, “F”, “3,00,000,000,000,” and the issuance date of the bank check on August 31, 2012, at D offices operated by the Defendant in the commercial building in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
2. The Defendant was engaged in the manufacture and wholesale business of infant goods from around 2000 to “D”. Around July 2009, the Defendant was unable to recover the price of goods due to the default by the customer and the operation of D was difficult, and even during the game.