Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year on January 25, 2018 by the Seoul Eastern District Court for obstructing the performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment on February 2, 2018 becomes final and conclusive and conclusive.
[2] On February 16, 2018, the Defendant did not pay taxi expenses in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul at around 07:25, and did not pay the taxi expenses to the police officers in the said district with his name-free taxi driver, and the police officers in the district in the said district in question in the following: (a) caused disturbance, such as fluencing the flusium, and (b) continuously caused disturbance at the entrance of the district; (c) while he was recommended to return home from the slope D belonging to the said district, the Defendant was punished for the revocation column of the government office.
In other words, "Ye, E. Haak, C. H., N. H. W. W. W. L. W. W. L. W. W. L. W. W. L. W. W. L.W. L. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L. 2.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes, public peace and maintenance of order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history;
1. The grounds for imposing a sentence of penal provision, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the grounds for imposing a sentence of imprisonment [type] interference with the performance of official duties (in the area of recommendation, decision on suspension of performance of official duties/decision on suspension of duties], the basic area, six months from June to June;