logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.01.08 2013고단6308
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B through a vehicle B.

On October 23, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol 0.223% of the blood alcohol concentration on October 23, 2015, and led the Defendant to make a bypass the road front of the Trithal rithal rithal rithal rithal from the Lrithal rithal rithal rithm.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate all-round and safely to protect the tea.

Nevertheless, the part of the victim C driver's subsequent wheels of the victim C driver's vehicle, which was directly affected by the negligence of bypassing the central line without neglecting this, was shocked with the front part of the car above.

In the end, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed the above vehicle owned by the victim to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,190,395 to repair cost, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as checking the condition of the damaged vehicle.

2. On the same date and time as stated in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant driven the abovero-type car from the parking lot for the 1.2 km 370 amam cl.mp. to the front of the chemical concrete located in the aml.m. in the aml. from the parking lot for the aml.m. to the chemical concrete in the aml. aml.m.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Report on the statement of the status of a drinking driver, and the written report on the status of a drinking driver;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. The fact that the defendant under Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (2) 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, although he has been punished for driving under the influence of alcohol on three occasions, he has no record of confession and rebuttal, there is no record of punishment for driving under the influence of alcohol after 2005, and the victim is the victim.

arrow