Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,00,000, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:45 on September 18, 2014, F of the police box belonging to the Haaknam Police Station Emba, and G demanded the driver of the vehicle to comply with the alcohol alcohol measurement because there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the vehicle was under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling the driver I during the investigation of the accident, after receiving a report from 112 that the vehicle was omitted on the front side of the Haak-gun, Chungcheongnam-nam Police Station Emba.

As such, the Defendants, one of the following: “F and G, are unable to take a drinking test; “F and G bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and “I,” Defendant D, her hand, her hand, pushed the F’s left arms, pushed the f’s chest at least four to five times, pushed the f’s chest, pushed the f’s chest, pushed the f’s chest, carried the f’s chest, and her arms, Defendant A used the f to take the f’s arms, Defendant C used the f’s arms, and Defendant C used the f’s finger and pushed the chest.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and I;

1. Application of the statutes to a copy of the service log of a police box;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose punishment: Fine.

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The fact that the Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, knew that the Defendants were in performing official duties and collectively obstructed police officers’ duties, thereby preventing police officers from measuring the level of drinking alcohol to I is disadvantageous to the Defendants.

However, at the time of the instant case, the Defendants reported the vehicle I driven to the police while leaving the reservoir, and saved in water. The police officers find the location of the accident and arrive at the scene later.