Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment shall be given to Defendant B for a period of two years from the date of confirmation of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are married de facto marital couple.

On June 6, 2019, the Defendants received a warning from police officers belonging to the original police station E district unit of the police station called “no longer than a disturbance,” which called “no more than a disturbance is likely to be avoided,” while being accommodated in the original cel D around 01:01, the Defendants received a report from the police officers belonging to the original police station E district unit of the police station called “no more than a disturbance.”

Since then, the above police officers attempted to return to the earth, Defendant A referred to as “satching, satching,” and Defendant A satisf and satfling the chest of G and Fmanman, sating their clothes retails and losses, and satching the satf of slope H.

이에 위 경찰관들이 피고인 A을 공무집행방해로 현행범 체포하자, 피고인 B는 “놔봐, 놔봐”, “개새끼”라고 말하며 손으로 경사 H의 팔을 잡아끌고 경위 F의 가슴을 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants to interfere with the 112-report processing and the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made to H by the police officer;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. An investigation report (related to video CDs, video CDs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation to the victim's photograph attached and arrest process, etc.;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendant B of suspended execution: The circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are expected to have occurred by the Defendants’ interest while under the influence of alcohol.

The Defendants reflect the instant crime.

It is necessary to strictize the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties in order to protect the legitimate performance of official duties of the State and to establish sound social order.