logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.04.11 2018나6416
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by F, expressed as the representative of the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as follows, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following judgments shall be added to the appeal No. 16.

The plaintiff additionally submits a written statement of W, X, Y, and Z (Evidence A No. 17-1 to 4) that is a document on which the plaintiff's assertion was printed in the court of the first instance, but it is difficult to believe that it is in light of the relationship with these clans or all other circumstances prior to the above, the following judgments are added to Chapter 9 of the first instance judgment.

"(C) Finally, after the judgment of the court of first instance was rendered, the plaintiff argued that the defects of the first resolution of this case were cured through the resolution of the special general meeting of September 2, 2018 (hereinafter "third general meeting of this case"), but in full view of the respective descriptions of the evidence Nos. 18, 19, 20, and 21 and the overall purport of the arguments, the 21-year-old LR issued a notice to convene the special meeting of clan 56 to the 56 members of the clan as the 56 members of the clan, and on September 2, 2018, the plaintiff elected F as the representative of the clan, and on September 2, 2018 (hereinafter "third general meeting of this case"), the first resolution of this case and N's lawsuit of this case were resolved to the effect that "the third general meeting of this case was resolved to confirm the scope of the 15-year-old damages of the plaintiff and the 215-year-old damages of this case (hereinafter "the third general meeting of this case").

arrow