logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.25 2017나6113
(명의신탁해지로인한)소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal are indicated as the representative of the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the text of the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment: ① “No. 3” in the first instance judgment No. 4 was written with “No. 3, 23, 24” with “No. 3, 23, 24” with “No. 3”, and ② “the place map” in the third instance shall be written with “one’s foot.”

B. Of the written judgment of the first instance, the part of the first instance court states that ① “The statement in Gap evidence No. 15 appears to be a clerical error in the force “salvy” at the time of the general meeting of December 5, 1993; ② “The plaintiff clan appears to be changed to the first Sundays of December 1993; ② “The plaintiff clan was in the trial of the political party, and the majority of the members of the clan were gathered on October 17, 1991, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it”; ③ “The records” after March 23, 191, 191, the part of the court of first instance states that “The plaintiff clan was decided to hold the general meeting of shareholders on the day before the first day of the regular meeting of shareholders, because the majority of the members of the clan were gathered on October 17, 191,” and ③ there is no evidence to acknowledge it;

2. 8. 8. The resolution was made to change the contents of Article 10 as “15 persons” with respect to Article 10 at the general meeting of December 5, 1993, but it is not clear what the purport of Article 10 is.

"each addition shall be made."

3. Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow