logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.31 2013고단4480
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

1. At around 10:00 on June 9, 2013, Defendant A and the Defendants inserted approximately 0.03 grams of psychotropic drugs in two for a single-time injection machine, in the EMel No. 607 located in Busan-gu, Busan-do, in two for a single injection room, respectively. Defendant A and the Defendants injected one of them into one for their arms and in their arms, and injected the remainder one for the Defendant B’s arms and legs.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones.

2. Defendant A

A. At around 10:30 on the same day as the above Paragraph 1 above, the Defendant issued a penphone by inserting approximately 0.03 gramopon into a single-use cell, and melting in water into a water, and then melting into the arms blood cells B.

B. On July 18, 2013, around 19:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 grams at the Defendant’s house located in Busan Southern-gu F in a single-use injection machine, melting with water into the body of the Defendant, and injected them into the body of arms.

C. On July 21, 2013, around 14:30 on July 21, 2013, the Defendant kept approximately 0.26g of philophones contained in plastic bags in the front parking lot located in Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City G, and carried them on the wall.

3. At around 10:30 on the same day as the above paragraph (1) above, Defendant B, at the above telephone room, put approximately 0.03g of oponon into a single-use injection machine, melted in water, and administered the Defendant’s arms to injection into the blood cells of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal made by the president of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including attachment of site photographs);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant B) Article 62 of the Criminal Act

arrow