logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.18 2018고단2766
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle B with detached motor vehicles.

On March 15, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.09% among blood transfusion around 21:00, and led to the driving of the above vehicle at the 0.09% of the alcohol level in the direction of the road near the etern C in the direction of the road near the etern C in the direction of the etern C in the south of the direction of the school distance.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the entire city and to safely operate the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the front side of the victim D (son, 49 years old) driving, which was going on the opposite vehicle line, to the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the above victim, such as leg and other saves, under which the above victim needs to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, did not immediately stop, and did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged party, and escaped from the site, even though the above saves were damaged to repair the above saves.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's (the purport of leaving the scene of an accident) some of the legal statements (the defendant had no intention to move too easily his body immediately after the accident or attempt to flee;

The argument is asserted.

According to the statement of each medical certificate against the defendant, it is recognized that the defendant suffered serious injury, such as a catus catus catus, fatus catus catus, and satus catus, etc., between the accident of this case and the accident of this case, but as long as the defendant was fatd immediately after the accident

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A fact-finding survey report and a traffic accident occurrence report;

1. On-site map and photograph 1.

arrow