A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a vehicle with low investment risk, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident).

On June 26, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:30, and 40-11 T-do Do 102 B-do Do Do Do 102 Do Do Do Do 102 Do Do Do Do Do 10, Do 201 Do Do 3 in the direction of the right west.

At the time, it was at night, and there was a two-lane road from which the center line of yellow solid lines and a white solid line of road A are installed, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty

Nevertheless, due to negligence of wrong operation of a steering gear by neglecting the steering gear in the front of alcohol, the Defendant was parked following the shocking of the part of the victim D, who was parked on the right-hand side of the said vehicle, in front of the right-hand part of the knife knife knife knife knife knife.

F-owned G Lastren’s car shocks, and the Defendant continued to proceed beyond the median line to the left-hand side of the front-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was parked in the opposite road A with the top-hand side of the victim’s H, the top-hand side of the Plaintiff’s low-speed car.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant caused the above-mentioned occupational negligence to take repair costs of 1,409,560 won, and damages each of the above-mentioned repair costs of 1,108,941 won, the Defendant did not take necessary measures immediately, and left the site without leaving the Defendant’s low-priced vehicle into the center of the road.

2. Defendant 1 violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), at the time, place, and at the time, place specified in paragraph 1 above. Defendant 2 made a passenger car with B low drinking while drinking.