Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Immigration Control Act, etc. at the Incheon District Court Branch Branch on May 22, 2015, and on April 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating, etc. of sexual traffic at the Incheon District Court on April 20, 2016, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating, etc. of sexual traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic) and released on August 21, 201
1. On January 14, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures after an accident) around 18:10 on January 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle with low-speed Caton around 18:10 on January 14, 2017; and (b) went away from the site without taking measures to prevent traffic interference or danger, such as immediately stopping and removing non-products, etc., at the flood level of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, the traffic signs installed at the intersection at the flood of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu of Ansan-si; (c) was shocked on the front side of the said motor vehicle; and (d) the Defendant got off the road without taking measures to prevent danger and injury to traffic, such as removing non-products.
2. On January 14, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at around 18:30, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle with a low repair engine at around 18:30 on January 14, 2017; and (b) reported the Defendant’s vehicle at the front of the E convenience store located in Ansan-gu, Masan-si; (c) and (d) on January 14, 2017, the towing vehicle driven by the F, which driven the Defendant’s vehicle after causing an accident as prescribed in paragraph (1) on the front of the E convenience store in Ansan-si; (b) proceeded as a pedestrian passage in order to escape from the Defendant’s road, and (c), 480,000 won for repair costs by receiving the exhauster of the Hk Center owned by the Victim’s owner from the front side of the vehicle; and (c) subsequently, even if the 1,340,000 won for repair costs by taking the vehicle as a vehicle and removing the damaged product immediately.