A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2016, at around 00:20 on July 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported the visit to the said police box on the grounds that the Defendant aboard a taxi did not inform his destination under the influence of alcohol; (b) reported the visit to the said police box; and (c) provided the Defendant with the warning that the police officer affiliated with the said police box (the age of 36) sent the Defendant questions about the destination, etc. to the said D’s defect, such as “the fluor of bitch, fluor of the mind,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crime by assaulting the Defendant at one time, at one time, in a manner of assaulting

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the CCTV photographing statute

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The criteria for sentencing of the reasons for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence of the sentence of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in June to April) shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the basic area of the sentence of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in June to April); (b) the nature of the crime of the instant case is inferior; (c) the fact that the Defendant recognized the crime and reflects the nature of the crime; and (d) other conditions for sentencing indicated in the records, including the Defendant’