Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, respectively.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant C and Defendant C, from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014, managed the apartment management by entrusting the president of the resident representative conference of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I apartment complex. Defendant B worked as the above apartment management complaint from March 6, 2012 to May 31, 2015.

Since February 2013, Defendants were trying to replace I apartment water pipelines from around February 2, 2013, Defendants had a duty to select a contractor through fair procedures.

Nevertheless, Defendant B, at the early May 2013 management office of I Apartment, was selected as a construction company around April 18, 2013 by J from A, a corporation operated by A, as a construction company around April 18, 2013, on the following grounds: (a) Defendant B received the notice of the selection of a construction company replacing K apartment water pipelines (including a company with a single construction contract price of at least three billion won (including a local heating conversion construction work) for replacement of apartment pipeline for the last two years) and (b) made it possible to receive a successful bid from J. The case holding that the qualification for participation is identical to the notice of the selection of a construction company replacing the K apartment pipeline.

Upon receiving the solicitation to the effect that “,” the Defendant C was given a fluent relationship with the Defendant C at the I Apartment Management Office, and Defendant C consented thereto.

Thus, on May 20, 2013, Defendant C convened a meeting for the representatives of occupants and led to a resolution that restricts the qualification to participate in the bidding of the construction company for the replacement of the I apartment water supply pipeline.

Accordingly, around May 23, 2013, Defendant B announced the selection of a construction company replacing I apartment water supply pipes (including a company with a single construction contract amount of at least three billion won (including a local heating conversion work) for the recent two years). Defendant B participated in the bidding of I apartment water supply pipeline replacing construction around June 10, 2013 and becomes a construction company.