logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.25 2016고단466 (1)
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, in the facts charged, was willing to show the case of replacing the water supply pipes of E apartment and F apartment as the performance of the above company, which cannot be recognized as the performance because he participated in the above bidding as a new company and the company, which participated in a general competition bid to select a construction executor, as a representative director of the C apartment apartment bid which participated in the bidding to select a construction executor (hereinafter referred to as the “the above company”), and as a new company, is likely to suffer disadvantages in the above bidding. In order to show as the performance of the above company the case of replacing the water supply pipes of E apartment and F apartment as the performance of the construction work in the name of the construction manager of E apartment and F apartment management, by forging the certificate of the performance

1. Forging a private document;

A. On February 2015, the Defendant: (a) without authority at the E Apartment Management Office located in J around Jinju-si; (b) without authority for the purpose of exercising; (c) with prior proof of “public mission: the replacement of E apartment water supply pipes and fire hydrant pipes; (d) the replacement of E apartment water supply pipes during the year 2014; and (e) with proof of the actual performance of the construction work as above, during the year 2014;

The trade name verifying the ordering person: E apartment management office, the name of the representative of the E apartment management office, and the name of the managing director: one copy of a certificate of the completed performance of construction works under the H’s name of the E apartment management office, which stated that the E apartment management office and the name of the representative: A copy of a certificate of the completed performance of construction works, which is a private document on proof of fact, was forged by the E apartment management office I who is aware of the fact.

B. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant without authority at the F Apartment Management Office at Jinju-si, for the purpose of exercising, and without authority, provided that “public mission: the replacement of F apartment water supply pipes and fire hydrants pipes; the replacement of F apartment water supply pipes during the year 2014; and the state time by proving that the construction completed completed as above;

The trade name verifying the ordering person: F apartment management office, the name of the representative: the F apartment management office, the name of the managing director J, with one copy of a performance certificate of construction works in the name of J.

arrow