logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.23 2012가단181781
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion on the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital due to drug addiction in accordance with the excessive taking of the depression. The Plaintiff’s medical personnel’s negligence in the process of treating the instant case, resulting in the Plaintiff’s occurrence of disability caused by the nephical neutism and the neutism damage, which is a disease with melting the left flag and the flag, and thus, is liable to compensate for damage therefrom.

2. The details and details of the treatment for the plaintiff;

A. On January 28, 2012, the Plaintiff saw a bath to commit suicide at home, and as the Plaintiff was failed, she drawed approximately 2 days of the eulatory eulty that was prescribed by the flat prescription.

Accordingly, around 20:00 on the same day, the husband was found to be in a mixed state due to drug addiction, and around 20:40, the defendant hospital was first in the defendant hospital.

B. At the time of the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was in a state of side fluoring on the telegraph including left arms at the time of the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital. The Plaintiff was in a state of side fluoring by drugs.

The medical personnel in the defendant hospital and the medical personnel inserted the misconduct to the plaintiff, and conducted the cleaning urgently, and thereafter treated the waste collection that occurred to the plaintiff while supplying the amount of money thereafter.

C. On January 29, 2012, the Plaintiff recovered food around 08:50, and began to appeal for the pass of the left arms from around 05:20 of the same month, and the same year.

2. 1. Appealing for physical activity along with the right angle of the left arms.

In addition to the opinion that the Plaintiff's symptoms are doubtful, the Defendant Hospital Embrypt and the medical team requested by the Scininininite had already been re-issued at that time, and blood circulation has already been carried out. Therefore, the Defendant Hospital Embin and the medical team recommended to continue to observe the progress along with the preservation treatment.

From February 3, 2012, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital had already been unable to recover, and notified the Plaintiff, etc. of the failure to recover. Since February 3, 2012, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital reduced the pain due to continuous medical treatment, and the father has improved.

arrow