1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is an educational foundation operating the Mine University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On September 24, 2004, the Plaintiff was enrolled in the Defendant Hospital due to the Obane accident.

On October 4, 2004, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the blood flasing surgery on the Plaintiff’s left side of the body, and the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff from the Defendant Hospital on October 19, 2004.

C. On November 25, 2004, the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Defendant Hospital that there was a pain on the left shoulder after the accident of the Oralone.

The medical team of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff’s name of the sick with the upper end of the upper end of the medical team, and on December 10, 2004, the medical team of the Defendant Hospital conducted a falsium in accordance with the falsium and the falsium in accordance with the falsium and the falsium (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

The instant surgery was conducted for about one hour and 40 minutes under the general anesthesia, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital and discharged on January 15, 2005.

On July 20, 2005, the Plaintiff applied to the Subdivision Seoul Metropolitan Hospital for a low symptoms. The medical personnel at the hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff’s name of sick with damage to his upper pathy pathy (the part of the Plaintiff’s pathy, in charge of the exercise, sense, etc., was assembled to the pathy below the pathy) and implemented pathy pathy pathy on November 15, 2005.

E. After August 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by medical personnel belonging to the department of rehabilitation in the Defendant Hospital as permanent completion of the pathy.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul's entry in the evidence of Nos. 1 through 6, 12 through 17, 20 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff alleged that there was no more than one movement of both arms before the instant operation.

However, prior to the instant underwater alcohol, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital had the Plaintiff take a attitude that seems to be plucking, plucking, and this was so.