A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 15, 2014, at around 09:15, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) operated approximately 5 kilometers on the front of a mutually irregular restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.064% under the influence of alcohol, and operated a 5 kilometer on the front road of the “chilled Councilor” located in 3-ro, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul.

2. As stated in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) had a DNA car driven by C while driving a motor vehicle in a drinking condition; and (b) received a report and demanded the police officer to verify the drunk driving; and (c) on December 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had the official in charge of the police station’s traffic survey in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City to engage in the act as if the Defendant was “E”; (b) had the official in charge of the police officer’s duty to make a report on the detection of the driver; and (c) had the official in charge of the police officer’s duty to put the official seal on the “report on the exposure of the driver; and (d) had the official in charge of the police officer’s duty to make a report on the actual statement of the driver’s office.

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged the signature of E and exercised it for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (2), continuously stated the name and resident registration number of the “E” in the personal information column, which is the statement of the traffic accident situation statement, kept in the above office, and stated as if the E caused the traffic accident as stated in paragraph (1), and then submitted the above document to the police officer in charge of the Defendant’s obstruction and seal it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and used private documents under the name of E without authority.

B. On December 2014, the Defendant related to “Agreement” is deemed to have reached an agreement.