logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.12.21 2019구단7032
추가상이처 인정거부처분 취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of disposition;

A. The plaintiff (B) entered on July 3, 1997 and discharged the plaintiff from military service on September 17, 2002.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that “the captain was shocked at Doluri during the preparation for a combat attack training for the police officers on August 2001, and during September 200, the Plaintiff received an operation under the diagnosis of Dolri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-re escape certificate due to the aggravation of severe labor between the construction site of the military unit, at the construction site of the tennis station,” and applied for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State on September 26, 2002. On March 28, 2003, it was recognized as a soldier or policeman on duty as a soldier or policeman on duty and was determined as a Grade 7 disability rating.

C. On March 5, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the escape certificate of the conical signboard (hereinafter “instant wounds”) No. 5 - 1 in the 2018 to recognize the escape certificate as an additional wound, but was rejected on October 16, 2018.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

(D) On December 24, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on April 23, 2019 (e).

On the other hand, even on September 23, 2015 and September 11, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant to recognize the instant difference as an additional wound, but all of the applications were rejected, and the appeal was filed, but all of the appeals were dismissed.

F. As a result of the instant court’s medical record appraisal, the following was determined:

As a result of the diagnosis on May 7, 2002, the plaintiff complained of the abnormal senscence and urine on the left side from about 10 months prior to the time, and the plaintiff underwent the operation two times due to the protruding escape certificate on January 3, 2002, and the left side is the opinion of the 5th Mescinary symptoms as a result of the inspection.

This is all the opinion that corresponds to the symptoms of post-signing escape from the 4-5th century, and it is not revealed the symptoms, symptoms, and symptoms of the injury in this case.

According to the radiation and opinion of October 25, 2001 at the National Armed Forces Chang-dong Hospital, C Hospital taken on August 25, 201.

arrow