1. Following the amendment of the purport of the claim by this court, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's claim.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 1, 2003, the Plaintiff is serving as Second Lieutenant in the Army and is serving in the military as Second Lieutenant.

On October 31, 2006, the discharge from active service was first discharged on the part of the First Lieutenant.

B. On July 5, 2005, the Plaintiff, while serving in the military, transported materials for training the reserve forces during the mobilization training.

On December 6, 2005, the National Armed Forces Water Service Hospital was under the diagnosis of the "Thyeong escape certificate No. 5-Tap. 1, 2005" (hereinafter "the accident in this case"), and accordingly, it was subject to the internal disc-pacting.

C. On January 7, 2014, the Defendant, after the Plaintiff’s expulsion, determined that the Plaintiff’s escape certificate was different from that of a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (accidents of disaster injury) on January 7, 2014.

On August 1, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the “surical signboard escape certificate” by C Hospital No. 4-5, and the Mali-Woman No. 5-Woman No. 1.

E. On June 27, 2017, the Plaintiff, on the instant accident, filed an application for registration with the Defendant, such as the person who rendered distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant injury”). However, on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize that the instant injury was caused due to the performance of duties or education and training during military service or aggravated at a natural progress beyond a certain level, the Defendant rendered a decision-making disposition against the Plaintiff on February 2, 2018 that rendered distinguished service to the State and did not correspond to the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 4, 5 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The difference in the plaintiff's assertion was caused by the performance of duties or education and training during the military service, such as the instant accident, or is beyond a natural progress.