A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

[2] A repeated crime case: The details of the judgment of the Cheongju District Court on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes ( Escape Vehicles): Imprisonment with prison labor for the lapse of ten months: September 25, 2014; the judgment of the Seoul Northern District Court on December 11, 2003 (the imprisonment with prison labor for six months and the suspended execution for two years) (the imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that sentenced the Seoul Northern District Court on February 2, 2006 (the imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that sentenced the Seoul Northern District Court on December 17, 2008 (one year and six months) to the Seoul Northern District Court on December 24, 2014 (the imprisonment with prison labor for one million won) / [the crime of fraud] the judgment of the Seoul Northern Northern District Court on December 24, 2014 (the imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months).

1. He/she shall not indicate or state an attorney-at-law or a law office, other than attorneys-at-law who have violated justice;

On October 2014, the Defendant produced the name of "A, not a lawyer," a false address and name of "A," at the residence of Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and displayed it to E (n, 32 years of age) by showing it to E (n, 32 years of age).

"2016 Highest 606" case

2. On January 2015, the Defendant began to associate with the victim G (hereinafter “F”) by making a false statement to the victim G (hereinafter “V”) who was aware of the “F” through the “B” test, and was employed as a public prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor’s Office, Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and then is working as an attorney at the near the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor’s Office.”

On January 31, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “A family members are unable to move due to their loss of wallets shall not have contact, but they shall lend one credit card. If a lost credit card is reissued, it shall be repaid.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not an attorney-at-law but was lost, and there was no certain occupation at the time, so even when using the victim's card, there was no intention or ability to pay the user's card.