Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five months and for eight months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a certified judicial scrivener who has operated a certified judicial scrivener office in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

Defendant

B is a person who has worked as a certified judicial scrivener office as a member of the A certified judicial scrivener office between the defendant A and the Dong Office.

1. Defendant B

A. Around January 2013, the Defendant violated the law of law, at a certified judicial scrivener office, the Defendant independently accepted the case between A and A and dealt with it in the name of A, and provided money to A.

On January 2013, the Defendant independently accepted the case from January 2013 to December 2013, 2013, including the receipt of KRW 90,000,000 in return for the request for the bankruptcy petition via the Internet homepage at the A Certified Judicial Scriveners Office’s Internet homepage, and independently accepted the case in the name of the Defendant A.

Accordingly, the defendant lent and used A's certified judicial scrivener registration certificate.

(b) No person, other than an attorney-at-law, shall indicate or state his/her opinion that he/she will handle legal counseling services or other legal services with an intention to use his/her attorney-at-law or law office or to benefit therefrom;

From January 2013 to December 2013, the Defendant independently operated a certified judicial scrivener office A. From around December 2013 to around December 2013, distributed leaflets containing his/her phone number and the phrase “legal office specializing in credit recovery,” and puts a letter stating the same phrase on the Internet page of “Law Office Specializing in Credit Rehabilitation” (F).

Accordingly, the defendant, not an attorney-at-law, has indicated or indicated that he/she will handle legal counseling or other legal affairs for the purpose of indicating or indicating an attorney-at-law or law office or obtaining a benefit.

2. Around January 2013, Defendant A consulted with B about the same content as the above-mentioned A-A-A-A-related office.

The defendant from January 2013 to December 2013 according to the above consultation.