The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around March 24, 2012, the Defendant, using the victim’s resident registration number (F) that he/she had been aware of from the victim E, working together in the office located in the Jeonju-gun, Jeonju-gun, the Defendant denied the victim’s resident registration number by the same method 19 times as indicated in the list of crimes, from that time until June 4, 2012, from that time, via the victim’s resident registration number (F) was entered at the Internet game site.

2. In light of the fact that the victim E reversed each of the statements at the investigative agency and this court on the sixth trial date and the statement that “the defendant informed the victim’s resident registration number to be known to him/her to make settlement in the game,” and the background leading up to the reversal of the statement, the defendant can recognize the fact that he/she used the resident registration number for small amount settlement with the victim’s permission. As such, each of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant used the victim’s resident registration number unlawfully, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the