Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2014, the Defendant filed a complaint with the public service center of the Seoul Nowon Police Station that stated that “C is a mobile phone new service contract in the name of the complainant and that “F,” and “G” in the name of the complainant in order to open the two mobile phones under the name of the complainant using the resident registration certificate of the complainant A, the Defendant filed a complaint with the following: (a) on the name of the customer information column for the application for the subscription of the SK Telecom Service New contract; (b) 1 copy of the mobile phone new service contract in the name of the complainant; and (c) on the name of the customer information column for the applicant for the subscription of the SK Telecom Service New Contract; (d) 204 in the name of the petitioner; and (e) A’s signature in the application column; and (e) around that time, the Defendant forged a copy of the mobile phone new service contract in the name of the complainant; and (e) accordingly, submitted a written complaint to punish him/her as the

However, in fact, upon the J's request, the defendant opened two cell phoness of SK Telecom, and found the above sales store, and requested the above C to open two cell phones in the name of the defendant, and granted C the right to prepare a new service contract required therefor. However, C did not arbitrarily prepare and forge a new service contract for SK Telecom service without the consent of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was dismissed for the purpose of having C be subject to criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. C and J’s legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. A complaint;

1. A copy of the SK Telecom Service New Contract, the original of the new contract (documents in the LG Uplus Form) and the Defendant and the defense counsel, not the SK Telecom, directly prepared or directed C to prepare the name, resident registration number, and the account number column of the LG Upl Service New Contract, but the address, the applicant client, and the Defendant’s signature are not prepared by the Defendant himself, and thus, the new service contract of this case is deemed legally invalid.