logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.05.20 2016고정129
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a C-private truck owner.

On October 22, 2015, the above private-use truck used by the defendant is prohibited from being provided or leased for transportation of cargo, and the defendant lost the cargo of the owner E in Busan D on October 22, 2015.

In addition, it received KRW 1,300,000 in return for transporting this article to Busan F.

Accordingly, the defendant provided cargo transport service using his own private-use truck for compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. Application of the written accusation and written statements to statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 67 subparagraph 7 and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant was punished once by a fine of this kind on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that the Defendant transported an article using five tons of cargo trucks registered for business purpose, and one ton of the instant private-use truck, and received KRW 400,000 in return for the transportation of the instant private-use truck under the pretext of KRW 1.3 million and personnel expenses, etc. Accordingly, the Defendant’s punishment is determined as per the order, taking into account the fact that the cost of transportation of the instant private-use truck appears to

arrow