logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.10.05 2018고정521
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The Defendant is the owner of a private-use truck in the instant charges.

No private-use truck used by the defendant shall be provided or leased for transport of cargo at a cost.

On February 13, 2018, the Defendant received approximately KRW 30,00,00 in return for transporting three stuffs at the Young-dong Samsung Electronic Parking C&M in the Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do.

Accordingly, the defendant's private-use truck was provided for transportation of cargo at a cost.

Even according to all evidence submitted or applied by the prosecution, it is insufficient to recognize that the defendant's vehicle is "trucks" as stated in the "truck Transport Business Act" and that the defendant received money in return for transporting cargo at the time, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Thus, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, it is decided to pronounce innocence by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow