logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.24 2018고정461
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The owner or user of a private-use truck shall not provide or lease his/her private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

Nevertheless, on September 29, 2017, the defendant used the removal of a person without a name in the indictment that he/she uses from the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the party branch of the Gu

D Haon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon 700,000 won and transported 70,000 won using private cars.

Accordingly, the defendant provided a private-use truck for cargo transport at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. On-site photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel are the fact that the defendant carried the article on a private vehicle of this case, but at the time, they only carried some things to observe the promise with the customer with the wind that the cargo article arrives late, and they do not receive any money separately for the part transported by the private vehicle of this case, so they do not constitute commercial transport.

The argument is asserted.

However, the director service charges include all the expenses, such as personnel expenses and vehicle service charges, required for removal, transportation, etc., and as long as the defendant agreed to transport materials for consideration and agreed to comply with the promise with the customer, or as a part of an article carried out for the convenience of the customer, the above act of the defendant can be evaluated as an act of providing the private cars of this case for transport of freight.

Defendant

We do not accept the assertion of counsel.

Application of Statutes

1. The freight truck business as well as the relevant legal provisions governing the crime and the selective trucking transport business;

arrow