beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 19, 2014, around 00:20 on July 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report that there was a sight in front of the company bank in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, 67 (Seocheon-dong) and sent to the site; (b) deemed that D’s face was at the time of the Defendant’s visit to the site, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of the reported case, etc.
2. Around July 19, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 01:10 on July 19, 2014, the Seodaemun Police Station, located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, arrested him as an act of obstruction of performance of official duties, and breathedly imprisoned in the state of being drunked and drunk, “I am out, am out, cut off, and cut off. I am out. I am back and am out. I am back. I am back, and am back. I son son son son son......... I son son son son son.....................”
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties, the choice of fines) and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance of revocation and the selection of fines);
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows, and the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors indicated in the instant pleadings.
The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and is in profoundly against the Defendant.
B. The Defendant is a primary offender.