A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2015, at around 20:15, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender in order to take a restaurant with a restaurant customer; and (b) escorted to the above police box, the Defendant: (c) sent to the said restaurant proprietor and her husband; (d) the above restaurant customer; and (e) the police officer’s assistant victim D of the above police box, in the presence of the police officer, who was in the presence of the above box, sent to the above restaurant proprietor and her husband; and (d) sent to the assistant victim D of the above police box, who was in the presence of the above police officer, who was in his/her possession of the box, and sent to the said box, the Defendant: (a) sent the fash d; (b) fash; (c) fash; (d) fash; (d) fash fash; and (e) expressed a large voice

The Defendant continued to see the horses, “I will bring the Defendant into a criminal case by insult” from the above D, and “I would like to look at how I would am sexually flag, thickness, internal imprisonment with prison labor, 10 years, and 5 years. However, I would like to see the sound “I am flab by imprisonment, I am flab, ambing down by cutting off I am flab, and ambing off I am. I am sar on the scam, floor, etc. of the police box, and amblashed by E by the police officer belonging to the above police box, and then, I am flasing the flab in the face and body of the above E.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order in the police box and the criminal investigation and police box of police officers, and insultd the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each statute of the F, G, and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order [the scope of recommendations] obstruction of performance of official duties.