The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment, and the fact that the defendant recognized all the crimes of this case and reflected his mistake is favorable to the defendant.

However, considering the fact that ① the instant crime was committed on several occasions to illegally enter the Republic of Korea with a false visa or a false marriage report, there is a need to strictly punish foreigners in view of the fact that there is a risk of causing various social problems due to the increase of illegal aliens in Korea, ② the Defendant is in charge of liaison with the visa and sought a male male who will make the most marriage, as well as the degree of participation, and ③ the Defendant has continuously committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that he was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime on June 28, 2011, ③ the Defendant continued to commit each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that he was punished by a fine on the same kind of crime on June 28, 201, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, it is not unreasonable for the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.