logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.05.29 2019고단902
위계공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall apply for a visa or a visa issuance certificate, or mediate such application, to allow an alien to enter the Republic of Korea.

On January 2016, the Defendant: (a) heard the statement that “I will obtain a visa available for employment in Korea if I have employed in Korea” from a person who was named in the name (title B) in Sknovash Republic of Korea (hereinafter “B”); (b) sought a visa from the Defendant’s passport and related documents, and requested the person who was named in his name to obtain a visa from the Republic of Korea for the purpose of obtaining a visa, such as the cost of issuing the visa, passport, health certificate, birth certificate, and certificate of graduation.” (c) sought the visa from the Defendant’s passport and related documents, as the price for the name, and requested the person who was named in his name to obtain a visa from the Republic of Korea.

Therefore, although the defendant is not a successor of the defendant who is an overseas Korean, the defendant's mother and the outer father's mother have forged a false birth certificate against the defendant who is named as the considered person, although the defendant is not an overseas Korean.

In addition, on February 3, 2016, the Defendant, at the Embassy of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea located in the Republic of Korea in the Sknban Republic of Korea, stated a false statement that he/she applied for a visa for the purpose of "overseas Koreans (F-4)" in the visa issuance application, and submitted these documents to the public official in charge of a nameless visa, along with the document, such as a de facto forged birth certificate, which was issued by the person in charge of false name.

As a result, the defendant applied for a false visa in order to make the defendant who is a foreigner enter the Republic of Korea in collaboration with a person who is not eligible for name, and at the same time, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the visa issuance review by a public official in charge of visa issuance in the Embassy of the Republic of Korea

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application for visa issuance;

1. The current status of individual immigration laws and regulations shall apply 1.

arrow