1. Among the surrounding claims of the instant lawsuit, a claim for compensation for losses arising from the expropriation of the remaining land with respect to B 963 square meters in Dongducheon-si.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Railroad construction projects (D, hereinafter referred to as “instant projects”): Public notice given by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on October 7, 2014 - Project operators: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on February 26, 2016 (hereinafter “instant adjudication”) - The object of expropriation is as indicated in the column for “subject to expropriation” in the attached list.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: April 19, 2016 - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statements in the column for “a ruling amount” in the annexed list.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation of the Institute of Bankruptcy and the Institute of Bankruptcy and the Institute of Appraisal and Appraisal (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication and appraisal”)

C. The appraisal result of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - The appraisal value: The appraisal value is as stated in the column of “court appraisal amount” in the annexed list.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 2, 4, Eul evidence 1 and 3 (including numbers, if any), the result of the appraisal commission to the appraiser F of this court and the result of fact inquiry, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s primary assertion 1) As the instant project is inevitable to move the Plaintiff’s place of business due to the expropriation of G land and the above ground obstacles owned by the Plaintiff, the Defendant, along with the reasonable compensation for obstacles to G land and the ground, is the head of Dongcheon-si, Dongcheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “C land”).

(B) B) 963 square meters (hereinafter “B”)

(2) The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder amount of KRW 858,243,540, the difference in the compensation determined by the instant judgment and appraisal as to G land and its above-ground obstacles, and any delay compensation therefor, in addition to the amount of compensation for the expropriation of the remaining land, the compensation for the expropriation of the building on C’s land which is the remaining building, the amount of business compensation, the amount of compensation for losses, and other obstacles. 2) If the relocation of the place of business is unnecessary, the Defendant is the Plaintiff at KRW 590,592,40, the amount of compensation for the decline in the value of the building on C