1. The portion of the instant lawsuit dismissed the claim for compensation equivalent to the cost of remuneration.

2. The defendant shall make the plaintiff 12,90.

1. Basic facts

A. The head of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approved the implementation plan for the urban planning facility project (road) project in the section B from Dobong-gu Seoul to C from May 16, 2013 by the head of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and publicly notified it as the Dobong-gu public notice D

B. The Plaintiff owned a house with a size of 192 square meters and its ground, which was partially incorporated into the foregoing business. However, on April 18, 2013, the said land was divided into a size of 135 square meters E (hereinafter “instant remaining land”) and a size of 57 square meters in F. 57 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. The head of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government filed a petition for adjudication of expropriation with the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City as he did not reach an agreement with the Plaintiff regarding the compensation for the instant land and obstacles.

On January 24, 2014, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee shall begin the commencement date of expropriation on the same year.

3. As of 14. The compensation for losses was set at KRW 150,073,00 and the decision was made to accept the land and obstacles in this case.

E. On March 3, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Central Land Expropriation Committee to increase the compensation for the instant land and obstacles, expropriate the instant remaining land and the entire land of the instant land, or compensate for the decrease in the price of the remaining land of the instant land, and finally agreed to sell the instant land and obstacles to KRW 150,073,000, the initial compensation for losses.

F. On June 19, 2014, the Central Land Tribunal rendered a ruling to dismiss the remainder of the Plaintiff’s objection on the remaining land of this case and the part that accepted the entire land of this case, while transferring the remaining land of this case to the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

G. Meanwhile, on May 23, 2014, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee rendered a ruling to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request for expropriation transferred by the Central Land Expropriation Committee.

[Reasons for Recognition]