Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 800,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B was a person who was born in the election of the president of the E Union, which was implemented on March 11, 2015, and the defendant A was a relative of the defendant B.

An election campaign may be carried out only in such cases as to whether it is whether it is immediately preceding the election day from the time when a registration of the candidate concerned is completed, and it shall not be carried out

Defendant

B requested Defendant A, who had an experience in gathering an election for the head of the past association, around August 2014. Defendant A, who was a member of the E association, accepted Defendant B’s request and issued a list of members E from Defendant B, who was admitted to the E association members on September 18, 2014, after having been admitted to the E association members on September 18, 2014.

When the former F Livestock Industry Cooperatives become aware of the existence of E members among the members of the “G,” which are the friendship group of the heads of livestock industry cooperatives, the Defendants were willing to engage in an election campaign by, for example, personnel management and appeal for support to the members of the “G,” the interest of the members of the said E association.

A. On October 31, 2014, Defendant A informed Defendant B of the fact that Defendant B had a “G” group at the I restaurant located in Singu-si around October 31, 2014, and had Defendant B find it at the above restaurant. On October 31, 2014, Defendant A, who committed the crime, is a member E with the interest of “G” member E, J, K, and L.

Defendant B was introduced by referring “I have the meaning of E Association,” and Defendant B had the said members “B.”

E is the object of the E Association.

In the personnel management of “,” there was an appeal for support, such as putting out name cards containing photographs, names, academic background, careers, election campaign-related phrases, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to carry out an election campaign before the election campaign period.

B. On December 18, 2014, Defendant A informed Defendant B of the fact that Defendant B had a meeting of “G” in the said I restaurant around December 18, 2014, and caused Defendant B to find it on the said restaurant. Defendant B, who is a member of the interest-based E of “G,” provided “G, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, and T.

E. It means an E.I. association.