beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000 (one million).
The Defendants did not pay their respective fines.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A as the head director of the I Union (a union referred to as “H farm”) operating “H farm” located in G in Gyeonggi-si, the Plaintiff was the head of the association during the election campaign period from February 26, 2015 to March 11, 2015. Defendant B is the member who runs the “K farm” located in Gyeonggi-gun J, and Defendant C is the member who operates the “M farm” located in Gyeonggi-si L.
On March 11, 2015, the Defendants got elected as a candidate for the president of the partnership at the first simultaneous election of the president of the partnership nationwide.
Any person is unable to make, or have another person make, a contribution on behalf of a specific candidate in connection with an election from September 21, 2014 to March 11, 2015, which is the period for the restriction on contribution by a cooperative election, the Defendants were the counter-party candidates from February 26, 2015.
O's assertion that N's debt amounting to KRW 100 billion during the term of office of the president of N in the text of election campaign was significantly increased by the text of the N. In order to hold N's election, members offered to create a place to provide meals by explaining the increase in the debt to prevent the need of the N's assertion or the support of N's counterpart candidate.
Defendant
B around 12:00 on March 4, 2015, at Q cafeteria P, the members R, S, T, U, and V were gathered, and Defendant A explained to the effect that the issue of increase in liabilities claimed by theO in that place was based on the equipment and assets investment or research and development expenses incurred in borrowing, and that the Defendant C paid KRW 22,00,00 of the food price for the food of D D and D and D and D by the credit card it used. The Defendant C paid KRW 22,00 as the food price for D and D and D through the credit card that he used.
As such, the Defendants conspired to act as a candidate for the election of the president of the partnership.
N made contributions for purposes of this Act.
Summary of Evidence
1. The first time;