logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.26 2016노416
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, while driving a vehicle at the time of the instant case into a three-lane and driving a vehicle at the time of the instant case and driving a vehicle at the time of the instant accident into a two-lane, trying to drive a vehicle of the victim and drive a vehicle of the defendant while moving the vehicle behind the vehicle of the defendant, and the defendant had contacted the front part of the right side of the defendant's vehicle at the left side of the victim's vehicle

Nevertheless, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below also asserted the same purport as the above grounds for appeal, and the court below held that when considering the photograph (record No. 11 page of the evidence record), it can be seen that the victim's vehicle is in the third lane and the vehicle of the defendant in the second lane before the victim's vehicle or the second lane before the victim's vehicle or the second lane before the victim's vehicle and after the victim's vehicle contacted with the victim's vehicle, and the remainder of each photograph, there is a trace of flaging the victim's vehicle to the right side before the victim's vehicle, and there is no trace of flag in the victim's vehicle's left side, and in the front, there is no ground to view that the statement of the police's statement about D is insufficient, and that the above fact recognized through each photograph is consistent with D's statement, and if the vehicle of the defendant in the second direction after the victim's vehicle was stopped, the vehicle of the victim suffers with the victim's rear wheels.

As above, it is sufficiently explained that there is a flick flicking flicks around the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle). If the Defendant, as the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted, leaves the third line, and enters the second line, the Defendant’s vehicle is followed by the victim’s vehicle, and the Defendant’s vehicle is towed by the victim’s vehicle.

arrow