The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) of the instant accident is only caused by the victim’s intentional or negligent act, and the Defendant did not have any intention to damage the damaged vehicle.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① the Defendant’s vehicle is blicked with the driver of the damaged vehicle in the opposite side of the median line, and the Defendant’s vehicle passes ahead of the damaged vehicle and the traffic signal at the three-lane intersection in the front intersection; the Defendant’s vehicle stops or runs at very slow speed until the damaged vehicle reaches the intersection, although the signal at the intersection was changed to the straightway; ② the Defendant’s vehicle proceeds at low speed, despite the Defendant’s signal, the vehicle moving along the left side of the vehicle was changed to the lane of the Defendant’s vehicle; ② the vehicle at low speed; ② the vehicle of the Defendant’s vehicle is changed to the vehicle at which the left side of the vehicle was the Defendant’s vehicle; ② the vehicle at considerable intervals between the vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle is wide and the width of the lane; ④ the vehicle at which the Defendant’s vehicle was in contact with the left side of the vehicle without the Defendant’s direction to change the vehicle within the right side of the vehicle.