logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고정462
재물손괴
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On March 21, 2018, the Defendant became aware of the facts charged on the ground that the Defendant cannot make a left-hand turn because the Defendant was a victim C-owned car driven in front of the building B, which was parked in front of the building B, while driving his/her vehicle on the road in front of the building B in Yansan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 19:00.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's right side of the vehicle so that the market value can be repaired by not only once but also once.

2. Determination

A. Since the victim's vehicle parked in the gist of the change of the defendant and his defense counsel, it was hard to turn to the left, and confirmed whether the victim's vehicle was contact with the damaged vehicle, and the hand at the seat of the damaged vehicle was found to fall into the hand of rainwater and shocked by the damaged vehicle. However, the damaged vehicle was not damaged by the vehicle, such as the vehicle indicated in the facts charged, while the hand at the seat of the damaged vehicle was checked.

B. Whether a vehicle damaged by the Defendant’s act is destroyed or damaged, there are statements made by the victim, photographs of damaged vehicles, and black images as evidence that seem to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case.

2) The victim’s statement is found that the victim’s statement confirms the damaged vehicle following the occurrence day of the instant case, and there was a flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking on the right side, and it is found that flick flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flicking flick

However, the above evidence is merely a fact that the part on the right side of the damaged vehicle was damaged during the next day from the time the victim parked the damaged vehicle at the time of the occurrence of the case, and that the damaged person is presumed to have appeared in the black image confirmed by the victim.

arrow