A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 2013, at around 22:07, the Defendant: (a) provided D and trial costs with D’s drinking value issues within the E entertainment tavern for the operation of D in the Gyeongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) provided that she works at the police box of the racing police station, dispatched upon receipt of D’s report, and that she provided she “Isle, she is the police, she is the police. Hasle f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation and prevention of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (30 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the degree of damage is not significant, and that the mistake is remarkably repented through detention life for a considerable period of time);