Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around 08:10 on January 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sought to present an identification card from the police officer, a police officer belonging to the D District Unit of the Seocheon-si Police Station D District Unit of the Seocheon-si Police Station, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, B, 2020; (b) Company A, who was requested to present an identification card from the police officer belonging to the D District Unit of the Seocheon-si Police Station D District, who was called upon 112, called “Schpacker knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif knif kn

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police concerning the defendant's statement E in his court statement, 112 case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Gyeong Empics Empics and black stuffs video images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The reason behind sentencing - obstruction of performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished as acts that disregard public authority and obstruct criminal justice procedures.

- In light of the form and circumstances of the commission of the crime, the nature of the crime is not good.

The defendant is the first offender.

- The defendant was aware of the crime of this case and reflects the mistake.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime are considered, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the case.