1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 23, 2005, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), and the status of employment for training (E-8) was deleted on June 1, 2007 by the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act amended by Presidential Decree No. 20076, Jun. 1, 2007;

On August 1, 2008, when staying in the status of non-professional employment (E-9) sojourn, entered the Republic of Korea on October 1, 2008 as non-professional employment (E-9, the period of sojourn one year), and thereafter re-entry the Republic of Korea on September 23, 201, seven days before the expiration of the period of sojourn, applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on September 23, 201.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On June 11, 2013, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On August 12, 2013, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on April 25, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a hydroscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics.

Since 2007, the Plaintiff’s children C was able to teach with his name-free female-child organizations, but the family members of the above female-child organization opposed to this.

around February 16, 2009, the family members of women-friendly districts were able to kill C when C is in contact with women-friendly districts, but C's female-friendly districts were shootd by their families.