logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.21 2015노1396
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In the absence of the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on C as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact and thereby finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court’s judgment to the same purport is justifiable and the Defendant’s assertion of mistake is without merit.

① At police and court of the court below, C not only caused the instant fighting, the background leading up to the Defendant and C to the instant fighting, the Defendant’s face at the time of the dispute between the Defendant and C, and the Defendant’s defect that C was about to take and restrain the Defendant’s hand, and the Defendant’s handout of the Defendant’s handout, the apartment security guard E was given medical treatment to the emergency room due to the following: (a) the process leading up to the instant two people’s fighting; (b) C was given medical treatment to the patient’s handout immediately after the fighting; and (c) was consistently and naturally stated on the fact that he received medical treatment; and (d) also conforms to the contents of E and D’s written diagnosis and diagnosis that describe the contents of the statement.

② At the police and the court below’s trial, the witness E stated that “I am to the office of the defendant after receiving communication from D,” “I am to the office of the defendant,” “I am to am to the office of the defendant, I am to am to the front of the defendant,” “I am to am to am to am to the defendant, I am to am to am to am to son,” and the defendant was am to am to her son, even though I am to am to am to am to her son, and even if I am to am to am to her son, I am to am to am to her son, and I am to am to am to her son.” “I am to am to am to am to her son at the time.”

③ The witness D of the court below is the police and the court of the original instance, C.

arrow