logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2020.09.04 2019고단625
전기통신사업법위반등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and four months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A, in violation of the Telecommunications Business Act by Defendants A, who violated the said Act, are insurance solicitors, Defendants B, and C, who have no specific occupation. Defendants D are those with no specific occupation, and they may not intermediate another’s communications or provide it for another’s communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator.

Nevertheless, Defendant D, who became aware of the introduction of Defendant A’s seat, “necessary money” and Defendant A talks with Defendant A, Defendant D opened a mobile phone, Defendant A, B, and C sold it to a mobile phone purchaser, and Defendant D paid KRW 200,000 per mobile phone and paid the remainder of sales proceeds in installments by Defendant A, B, and C.

(1) On April 23, 2018, at around 10:00, Defendant D opened one mobile phone (F) with each other from the intercompactive mobile phone agencies located in the Sinsan City and around 11:00 of the same day, and one mobile phone (I) with each other from the intercompactive mobile agencies located in the H store located in Sinsan City and Gun. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C obtained two mobile phone from each other and sold the said mobile phone to the de facto purchaser who became aware of the Internet search at the end of the same day at the Sinsan City and Gun. Defendant D continued to receive KRW 700,00 per mobile phone from the former agency located in the J mobile phone on April 25, 2018. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C obtained the two mobile phone from each other and obtained them from the former Internet unrecognizing agency on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for other's communications.

2. The Defendant’s fraud by Defendant A around April 2020 and in fact around around April 2020.

arrow