Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was in a de facto marital relationship with C in which he operates convenience points B and was in a marital relationship with C during his claim for consolation money, and C is in a marital relationship with C in the above convenience point.

I think about it, and tried to make an objection to it.

On September 10, 2018, the Defendant refers to the victim who is a fluent customer of 1 to 2 in the B convenience store located in Jeong-up, Si, Jeong-dong on September 10, 2018.

Then, the back of the investigation:

For our mother to be flickly flicked by a show 3-month, it is essential that our mother should not be flickly flicked with a large flick flick,

The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by referring to her being aware of his or her fling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to the submission of transcripts by complainants);

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The summary of the evidence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act can be considered in relation to the circumstances leading the criminal defendant to the criminal act; the defendant reflects himself/herself and has no record of punishment other than once a fine for this type of crime; and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for the criminal act, circumstances after the criminal act, etc. in light of the records and arguments of this case, the punishment as ordered shall be determined as set forth in the order.