The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant only made a false statement in the court without any perjury.

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the facts charged of the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant appeared at the court of Suwon District Court No. 301 on November 10, 2015 to take an oath as a witness of the instant case involving obstruction of business with respect to Suwon District Court No. 301 on April 10, 2015, the lower court’s order 2015 senior group 2405C, and the defense counsel of the instant case

5-6 The degree of customers who have not calculated food will see out of the room.

“In all words, Don Don Don Don Don Don.”

The answer to “,” and the defense counsel again did not have the fact that 5-6 members of the restaurant 5-6 place a cafeteria in the instant restaurant, referring to Defendant (C referring to Defendant 1) as “two rings and E in any event” in the instant restaurant, such as the indictment.

The witness so that he can know the witness.

I am this witness? I am myth.

He is asked "......."

In addition, since there has been no interference with the business in the event of fighting, it is so far as it will be done in the trial so far.

"....... the prosecutor’s words "to memory the witness," which the prosecutor had, until he enters the C C C weathera.

“In the case of the E president”

E Abstract of the President

“The sound is so required as to be more than two times.”

“,” and “a sa-sa-sa-sa-sa-sa-sa-sa.

“I are aware of the case.”

“At the time, C testified to the effect that C does not interfere with any public bath or restaurant business even though he/she was aware of the fact that C had observed the disturbance and obstructed the restaurant business by avoiding the disturbance.”

B. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, each of the above statements by the Defendant is inconsistent with objective facts.