logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.11.04 2020가단215451
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's execution of the damage compensation case No. 2013Na17070 against the plaintiff is the Incheon District Court.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff was a doctor who opened and operated the C Hospital, and the Defendant was provided medical treatment from June 29, 2010 to C Hospital’s medical staff (hereinafter “C Hospital medical staff”), including the Plaintiff, at the center of C Hospital from June 29, 2010.

B. 1) On July 1, 2010, C Hospital medical personnel performed anti-monthly diversary agents and active diversary diversatives (hereinafter “first surgery”) using the Defendant’s diameter on the right side of the Defendant, and the Defendant discharged from C Hospital on July 13, 2010. (2) On August 9, 2010, the Defendant complained of symptoms, such as the pain and surging of the right side surgical surgery department, and was hospitalized again in C Hospital.

Nevertheless, until September 14, 2010, the pains at the right slot operation department continued, and the defendant was hospitalized to move to a hospital and received hospitalized treatment, such as open windows and continuous discharge of agricultural products. The defendant was diagnosed as chronic dypitis, and was diagnosed as chronic dypitis, and received the right sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere.

3) Afterwards, the Defendant was judged as having a disability level 4 with disabilities, such as a slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick sl.

Then, the plaintiff filed a claim for damages against the plaintiff (the Incheon District Court 2012Gadan29167).

Although there is no evidence that the Plaintiff violated the duty of prevention of infection on July 26, 2013, the above court erred by administering an antibiotics without efficacy without verifying the fact that it could verify the cause of infection caused to the Defendant, and thereby, caused the Defendant to the right and right and right and right and right and right and right.

arrow