beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;
B. 1,200,000 won and from March 31, 2015
Reasons
On March 14, 2014, the Plaintiff leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Defendant as KRW 50,000,000 for the lease deposit, KRW 5,000 for the monthly rent, KRW 5,000 for the monthly rent (Additional tax separate), and KRW 100,000 for the management expenses, such as the cost of fire safety control, etc. (per annum). The Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff monthly rent after March 2015. The fact that the Plaintiff did not pay KRW 100,00 for the management expenses, such as the cost of fire safety control, etc. after the date of the above contract does not conflict between the parties, or that the Plaintiff did not pay KRW 100,00 for once after the date of the above contract, according to the overall purport of the entries and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the above lease contract was lawfully terminated due to the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case on the grounds that the Defendant failed to pay more than
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff real estate listed in the separate sheet, and pay KRW 1,200,000,000 for the unpaid management expenses until March 31, 2015 (i.e., 100,000 won per month) from the end of April 31, 2015, which was after the date of the above contract, to the Plaintiff, and pay KRW 5,60,000 per month for the amount of KRW 5,00,000 per month from March 31, 2015 to the time the real estate listed in the separate sheet is handed over to the Plaintiff (i.e., monthly rent of KRW 5,00,000 value-added tax of KRW 50,000,000 for the above management expenses of KRW 10,000 for the monthly rent of KRW 10
(1) The plaintiff did not set the completion date for the payment of KRW 5,600,000. However, after the defendant delivered real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff, the part of the claim after delivery is dismissed. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above recognition scope, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.