1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Among the lawsuits in this case, the part of the plaintiffs' objection suit is raised.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the modification or addition to the corresponding part of the following. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Matters to be considered or added] Each of the 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th and 7th 7th 【In respect of Artificial Works” shall be replaced by “in respect of Minor Works during Artificial Works.”

The 3rd 7th 7th am "the construction period of 2008." is changed to "the construction period of 2009."

Part 3 9 "7,00,000" shall be added later than "7,700,000."

The 3th page 14 "Unclaimed amount of KRW 800,000" is replaced by "unsettled amount of KRW 700,000".

From the last 3th parallel to the fourth parallel, the whole is changed as follows:

“4 Plaintiff A paid the Defendant totaling KRW 60,000,000 from February 2, 2010 to July 28, 2010.

From 4th to 12th e.g., Sungnam-si decided to file a lawsuit against F Building and to 2012nd 3th e.g., the Suwon District Court.

The entire portion of “Dunnam-si” is changed as follows: “The aforesaid buildings are not to be delivered because of lien holders even after the completion of the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to F buildings,” and “The above 35 construction companies, including Plaintiff A, will repay for punch in place of Punch in the extent that the lien is established between the 35 construction companies including the Suwon-si Branch of Suwon District Court 2012No. 35 construction companies, to the extent that the lien is established. The above companies will first receive five billion won as advance from Punnam-si and receive five billion won as advance payment from Punnam-si, and then deliver the above punch-si building to Punnam-si, to determine the existence of the lien and the scope of the construction cost under the lien. Accordingly, according to the result, the remainder from Punnam-si will be repaid from the date on which six months have passed after the above lawsuit became final and conclusive.