1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The Defendant: (a) KRW 372,327,923 to the Plaintiff; and (b) from May 22, 2017 to July 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except for the alteration or addition as follows. Thus, this part of the basic facts is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Nos. 3, 11, and 12 of the text of the judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff changed from December 20, 2013 to “from December 20, 2013 to the date of separate notification” to the Defendant. The Plaintiff notified the Defendant on March 26, 2014, “3.31, 201,” and extended the period of construction to “ June 11, 2014,” and the Defendant changed to “from that time, the establishment of the instant bridge was completed.”

The 4th page 13 of the first instance judgment is replaced by “the Plaintiff” as “the Defendant.”

In the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment, 5th to 14th to 5th “the plaintiff was finally determined”, was changed to “the plaintiff and the defendant, etc. filed a lawsuit claiming damages due to the instant accident (hereinafter “the instant case”). The claim against the defendant was finalized by dismissal at the first instance court. The plaintiff’s claim against the plaintiff was finalized to 79,628,819 won, and 254,35,119 won, and 61,609,834 won, and damages for delay to K, and 61,609,834 won, respectively, in the appellate court (the Daejeon District Court’s 2014Da4371, Daejeon High Court 2016Na10351).”

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the plaintiff" is added to "by May 2, 2017" after adding "the plaintiff" to "the second part."

No. 6 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance is "victims involved in the accident".

Then, on August 6, 2014, M filed a lawsuit claiming damages against the Defendant, etc. due to the instant accident, which was rendered a judgment against the Defendant, etc. on December 18, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 7, 2016.

The Daejeon District Court shall add "2014 Gohap2863."

2. The plaintiff's assertion is selected, the defendant is responsible for the safety management according to the instant bridge construction contract.