logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.07.17 2017고단658 (1)
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is a person who operates a Chinese restaurant under the trade name of "E", the defendant and F have served as an insurance designer, and G as an employee of E operated by D.

In fact, at around 09:30 on March 13, 2014, G had been in danger of injury, such as the pelus, located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, and on the same day, D, F, and G had already received emergency treatment at an I Hospital, despite having already received the said emergency treatment at the I Hospital, as contractor and beneficiary of E around 11:16 on March 13, 2014, G as the insured, and D prepared an insurance subscription for the insurance product of the “non-dividend Samsung F& 1’s partnership” as the insured. D signed the insurance contract on behalf of Defendant G by stating that “the insurer has not received treatment within the last three months from its doctor during the contract period.” From March 13, 2014 to 30:10 on March 13, 2014, by submitting the insurance document on behalf of the victim Samsung F&O to the victim insurance company, and had it enter into the insurance contract from 30:30 on March 14, 20194.

As seen above, since the insurance was purchased after the occurrence of a multi-child accident beyond G, the injury therefrom is not subject to insurance, even though the insurance designer is not a beneficiary of insurance, if the insurance designer, the defendant is considered to be helpful for his insurance solicitation business if he attempts to receive disability insurance benefits after the general injury that could receive a relatively large amount of amount due to the said accident, and then, on May 2014, 201, the defendant can receive disability insurance benefits even after he was unable to make the G's artificial intervention.

It is not a problem because of the fact that the insurance company has already been investigated into the insurance company and the insurance proceeds have already been paid.

In this regard, I would like to introduce the author of damage, so I would like to claim compensation for disability.

arrow